Creep or Plague?
The Global Problem of Development Creep in Other Cultural Landscapes
(By Kora* / Direction and editing: Glenn Armstrong)
Kokoda is not unique. Across the world, heritage sites are
slowly bending toward donor agendas that were never meant to be there.
And if you wonder why multi-million dollar aid programs
disappear into the ether, here’s why.
1. Cambodia — Angkor Wat
Angkor Wat’s conservation programs have expanded to include:
- community
livelihoods,
- gender
empowerment,
- climate
resilience,
- migration
research,
- waste-management
studies.
Result: important programs, but heritage is no longer the
centre of gravity.
2. Nepal — Everest Region
Originally focused on mountaineering safety and cultural
preservation, the Everest region is now home to:
- carbon-offset
initiatives,
- climate
modeling hubs,
- global
tourism governance,
- resilience
programming.
The Sherpa cultural narrative is now an annex, not the
headline.
3. Peru — Machu Picchu
Machu Picchu’s protection has expanded into:
- relocation
of communities,
- economic
policy research,
- international
conservation politics.
Local Andean interpretations of sacred space have been displaced by external definitions of “world heritage value.”
4. ULURU: a “close to home” example of meaning
realignment
Uluru is one of the clearest
examples in Australia of a sacred heritage space being reshaped by shifting
policy, public behaviour, and development agendas.
For decades, Uluru was marketed primarily as a tourism
asset — a place to climb, photograph, and consume. Its cultural
significance to the Anangu people was secondary. It was not “development creep”
in the donor sense, but it was interpretation creep: the meaning of
Uluru became increasingly defined by commercial tourism rather than cultural
truth.
Only in recent years — particularly with the 2019 climbing
ban — has Australia re-anchored Uluru in its proper narrative:
- a
sacred site,
- a
living cultural landscape,
- and
a place where Indigenous custodianship must lead.
Yet even now, Uluru is used as a platform for broader
national stories: reconciliation, climate policy, Indigenous economic
development, national identity debates. Good causes — but still examples of how
heritage sites are constantly repurposed to suit contemporary priorities.
This parallel helps explain the stakes for Kokoda:
When the meaning of a sacred space becomes fluid, contested, or driven by
external frameworks, the story does not simply evolve — it risks eroding.
Many scattered Pacific WWII sites (Solomon Islands, Palau,
Micronesia) are increasingly used as platforms for:
- marine
conservation,
- anti-trafficking
programs,
- climate
displacement planning.
Important issues — but again, heritage becomes a carrier,
not the cargo.
Here are some that have become “Development Platforms”
Solomon Islands — “Guadalcanal Battlefield Region”
Once the site of some of the most intense fighting of the
Pacific War, Guadalcanal now hosts numerous development initiatives attached to
WWII heritage spaces.
Examples of development creep:
- Coral Triangle Initiative (CTI) projects using WWII
shipwreck zones as “marine conservation demonstration sites.”
- UNDP resilience programs tied to battlefield communities,
leveraging the “historic significance” to attract funding.
- Waste management and plastic pollution programs anchored
around WWII memorial beaches (e.g., Red Beach, Tenaru).
- Gender and youth programs held at or branded around major
memorial areas to improve turnout and donor visibility.
Result: Guadalcanal’s WWII heritage narrative competes with
modern development branding, creating a hybrid space where memorialisation is
no longer the primary frame.
Palau — “Peleliu Battlefield & Bloody Nose Ridge”
Peleliu was one of the bloodiest battles of the Pacific.
Today it is simultaneously:
- a heritage site,
- a protected area,
and a development hub for climate and marine policy.
Examples of development creep:
- USAID climate resilience programs using Peleliu’s WWII
airfields and caves as field classrooms.
- UNESCO’s “Sustainable Island Livelihoods” pilot programs
framed around battlefield tourism.
- Marine Protected Area creation overlapping with WWII
amphibious landing zones.
Result: Peleliu’s wartime story is now routinely bundled
with climate adaptation messaging, even in official tourism materials.
Federated States of Micronesia — Chuuk Lagoon (Truk
Lagoon)
Chuuk Lagoon contains the world’s largest underwater WWII
shipwreck graveyard. Its story has been significantly reframed.
Examples:
- Japanese-funded fisheries management projects branded as
“preserving historic waters.”
- Marine archaeology projects repurposed into economic
development and reef-restoration platforms.
- UNESCO-led cultural preservation tied to sustainable tourism
capacity-building (hospitality training, business training, financial literacy
workshops).
Result: The site’s primary function is no longer historical
remembrance but economic development via eco-tourism and marine conservation.
Papua New
Guinea — Rabaul & Kokopo (New Britain)
Former Japanese stronghold with extensive tunnels,
airfields, and wartime relics.
Examples:
- Climate resilience and disaster preparedness programs
(because of volcanic activity) that use WWII sites as community hubs.
- Heritage tourism“incubators’” run by NGOs using Rabaul’s
wartime sites to justify funding for SME training and women’s cooperatives.
- Marine ecology projects tied to the wrecks in Simpson
Harbour.
This is softer creep than Kokoda — but it's there.
Kiribati —
Betio, Tarawa Atoll
One of the bloodiest amphibious landings in the Pacific.
Examples:
- Coastal erosion and climate change projects using WWII seawalls and bunkers as evidence-based teaching sites.
- Hygiene and sanitation programs held at WWII memorial
grounds for community visibility.
- Marine debris removal projects funded under the
justification of “protecting war heritage.”
PATTERN SUMMARY
Across the Pacific:
WWII sites have been reinterpreted as:
- climate labs,
- conservation hubs,
- SME training grounds,
- gender-equity spaces,
- tourism capacity-development zones,
- disaster-preparedness centres.
All valuable.
But not what the sites were meant for.
Further Reading:
https://smartshopper-png.blogspot.com/2025/11/who-owns-kokoda.html


Comments
Post a Comment